Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Ensuring Consistency in AI-Generated Codebases with OTF

Updated
1 min readView as Markdown
Ensuring Consistency in AI-Generated Codebases with OTF

Lovable shipped a working SaaS dashboard in eight minutes. Cursor refactored a 40k-line monorepo overnight while the senior engineer slept. These aren't hypotheticals — they're what builders are shipping today, and the gap between "idea" and "running app" collapsed in 2025 in a way that genuinely surprised everyone, including the people building the tools.

The hard part isn't generation. The hard part is the day after.

When an agent produces 1,200 files in a single sitting, every subsequent edit needs to honor the same patterns. Agents are probabilistic. Ask Cursor to add a Settings page and you'll get a Settings page — and a new CSS approach, a new way to handle forms, and a shade of blue the rest of your app doesn't use. Not because the tool is bad.


This is an excerpt. Read the full post at otf-kit.dev/blog/ai-agents-vs-human-consistency — full-stack kits your AI coding agent can actually ship to production. Browse the kits →

More from this blog

O

OTF — kits your AI coding agent can ship to production

491 posts

Engineering notes on shipping production apps with AI coding tools — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Lovable, Bolt — and the stack underneath: React Native, Expo, Next.js, Supabase. Honest takes on what works, what breaks, and the full-stack kits that get you to production faster. By OTF.